Sinter and intrasearch beacon

ABSTRACT

A method for cell reselection control is disclosed, comprising: sending an instruction from a radio network to a user equipment (UE) in an idle mode to adjust an existing cell reselection parameter at a UE to a high value; subsequently instructing the UE to return the cell reselection parameter to its previous value, after a first predetermined interval; and subsequently sending a second instruction to the UE in an idle mode to adjust the cell reselection parameter at the UE to the high value, after a second predetermined periodic interval, causing the UE to reselect to a cell with superior signal even when the UE may be under good coverage attached to an existing macro cell, thereby offloading the macro cell.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit ofpriority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of, U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/405,311, titled “Sinter and Intrasearch Beacon”, and filed May 7,2019, which itself is a continuation of, and claims the benefit ofpriority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/932,241, titled “Sinter and Intrasearch Beacon”, and filed Feb. 16,2018, which itself claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 62/459,639, titled “Sinter andIntrasearch Beacon”, and filed Feb. 16, 2017, each of which are herebyincorporated by reference herein in their entirety. This applicationalso hereby incorporates by reference in their entirety for all purposesU.S. Pat. Pub. No. US20140133456, titled “Dynamic Multi-Access WirelessNetwork Virtualization” and published May 15, 2014, and U.S. Pat. Pub.No. US20150257051, titled “Federated X2 Gateway” and published Sep. 10,2015. Additionally, the following documents are hereby incorporated byreference in their entirety for all purposes: U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 15/721,728, titled “Handovers with Simplified NetworkTopology”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/782,819, titled “X2Brokering Between Inter-3GPP Release eNodeB's”; U.S. Pat. Pub. No.US20170273134A1, titled “IuGW Architecture”; and U.S. Pat. Pub. No.US20160044531A1, titled “Congestion and Overload Reduction”.Additionally, 3GPP TS 25.331 10.3.2.3, 3GPP TS 25.304, 5.2.6.1.1Measurement rules for cell re-selection when HCS is not used, 3GPP TS25.304, 5.2.6.1.2 Measurement rules for cell re-selection when HCS isused, 3GPP TS 25.304, (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) procedures in idlemode, 5.2.4.2 Measurement rules for cell re-selection are incorporatedby reference in their entirety for all purposes, dated as of thepriority date of the present application.

BACKGROUND

UMTS Femtocells are deployed either on their own 5 MHz frequencysub-band (Downlink-frequency—“UARFCN”), or on a frequency sub-band whichthey share with UMTS macro-cells (macro base stations). The UARFCN usedby femtocells is hereafter referred to as “UARFCN femto.” In most cases,an operator deploying femtocells owns a second (or even third) 5 MHzfrequency sub-band that is reserved for exclusive use by macro-cells,which is referred to as “UARFCN macro”.

The operator's objective is to assure that their customers' handsets(“UEs”) re-select from a (large-coverage) marco-cell to a close-byfemtocell whenever it makes sense, that is, when the UE has evaluatedand confirmed that femtocell is suitable from RF point of view, and thatthe cell reselection criteria are met. The evaluation is doneautonomously by the handset (i.e. without explicit commands from thenetwork) during idle-mode operation. It requires that the UE performsmeasurements on both the currently serving cell/frequency, as well as onthe target-cell/target-UARFCN.

SUMMARY

In a first embodiment, a method is disclosed, comprising: sending aninstruction from a radio network to a user equipment (UE) in an idlemode to adjust an existing cell reselection parameter at a UE to a highvalue; subsequently instructing the UE to return the cell reselectionparameter to its previous value, after a first predetermined interval;and subsequently sending a second instruction to the UE in an idle modeto adjust the cell reselection parameter at the UE to the high value,after a second predetermined periodic interval, causing the UE toreselect to a cell with superior signal even when the UE may be undergood coverage attached to an existing macro cell, thereby offloading themacro cell.

The cell reselection parameter may be an Sintersearch threshold. Thecell reselection parameter may be an Sintrasearch threshold. The highvalue may be a maximum permitted value. The method may further compriserepeatedly raising the cell reselection parameter to a high value, inorder to cause the UE to perform a neighboring cell search from idlemode and identify another cell to which to attach. The firstpredetermined interval and the second predetermined periodic intervalmay be configured to cause the UE to perform a periodic neighboring cellsearch while having a 5% impact on projected UE battery life. The firstpredetermined interval may be 5 seconds and the second predeterminedperiodic interval may be every 5 minutes.

The previous value may be a cell reselection parameter value configuredbased on an assumption that significantly overlapping cell coverage maybe rare. The cell with superior signal may be a small cell configured tocover a small area that may be a subset of the coverage area of theexisting macro cell. The radio network may be a nodeB, an eNodeB, aradio network controller, a 3G core network, or a 4G core network. Theradio network may be a nodeB or eNodeB, and the radio network may beconfigured with the first predetermined interval and the secondpredetermined periodic interval by a coordinator node in an operatorcore network. The cell reselection parameter may be a SsearchRATthreshold. The cell reselection parameter may be an SrxlevServingparameter in a Long Term Evolution (LTE) radio access technology.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an architecture diagram of a wireless network, in accordancewith some embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a timeline diagram of interfrequency search, in accordancewith the prior art.

FIG. 3 is a timeline diagram of interfrequency search with aninterfrequency search beacon, in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 4 is a second timeline diagram of interfrequency search with aninterfrequency search beacon, in accordance with some embodiments.

FIGS. 5A, 5B and 5C are schematic architecture diagrams showingsignaling, in accordance with some embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a coordinating server, in accordancewith some embodiments.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an enhanced base station, in accordancewith some embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A concept is disclosed which allows UEs to reselect effectively from alarge cell-serving as umbrella—to a smaller cell (micro, pico, femto),and while limiting the amount of neighbor cell measurements and keepingUE's battery usage low. To save battery, the UE only starts measuringneighbor cells when the serving cell's quality falls below a set of“Search”-thresholds. This mechanism is defined by 3GPP (for 3G, andsimilar for 4G). The thresholds are used in a static way: they areunchanged during the cell's operation, or only changed occasionally, inthe context of the radio network optimization. If a UE is in the smallcell's range, it may not reselect to it as early as the operator maywish. Even more so, if the small cell uses different frequency than theumbrella cell, the UE may not reselect at all. In any case,inter-frequency reselection is not deterministic, and intra-frequencyreselection not optimal or occurring late. The solution is a “Sinter-and intrasearch-Beacon”, which consists in modifying theSearch-thresholds dynamically, with a periodically, short-term appliedhigh level. This incites the UE to look for suitable neighbor cells, butonly during a short time, thereby keeping battery consumption low.

The subject is the management of cell re-selection by the UE, from aUTRAN macro-cell to a UTRAN micro-, pico- or femto-cell, or from onfemtocell to another femtocell, and even from a macro-cell to anothermacro-cell. The proposed solution offers a method that overcomes oneimportant “hurdle” (restrictive condition) that can prevent the UE fromreselecting between cells where it would be desirable to facilitatereselection: e.g. for load balancing, or generally for making use ofsmall cells. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure the advantagefor which the “hurdle” is used, is not lost: UE battery savings. Theneed for facilitating reselection is especially high for cases ofmobility from a macro-cell to a femtocell (e.g. when entering a home ofoffice), but it also exists for the other cases hinted at, above. Thereare a few patents and ideas on this subject, but those have inherentdisadvantages. These are e.g. costs, power consumption of the femtocellaccess point (FAP), disruption on the frequency spectrum(RF-jamming/interference). The here-proposed solution has none of thosedisadvantages and is achieved solely by implementation in software withlow effort. The solution makes use of functionality and data alreadyspecified by the 3GPP standard and used by today's commerciallyavailable handsets. The concept (S-inter-/intra-search beacon) can beimplemented in UTRAN macro-cells (i.e. in a macro-Radio NetworkController—RNC) as well as in femtocells. Note: Femtocells combine theRNC with the Base station functionality, on a single chip.

Two types of reselections within the UMTS/UTRAN system exist: (1)inter-frequency reselection (the current cell is on one UARFCN, whilethe potential target-cell is on another; and (2) intra-frequencyreselection (both the current cell and the potential target-cell operateon the same frequency)

For intra-frequency reselection, the UE must have detected and measuredthe quality of the potential target cells that are located in itsproximity. However, it will only start this search & measure process ifthe cell that it is camping on reaches a quality/signal strength below aspecific threshold. It is only when the serving cell's quality fallsbelow the threshold that the UE starts searching for cells on the samefrequency that it currently camps on. This threshold is specified by the3GPP standard as “Sintrasearch”, a value broadcasted by the cell to allUEs, via a common channel.

Analogous applies for inter-frequency reselection, where thecorresponding threshold is called “Sintersearch”.

If the serving macro-cell's strength or quality is above the threshold,the UE will not perform measurements and therefore not be in a positionto reselect to the femtocell.

In some embodiments, inter-frequency reselection is an interesting casein that small cell overlay/underlay deployments are often provisioned ondifferent frequencies. By provisioning, for example, a macro cell basestation with one frequency (perhaps one that propagates very well) and asmall cell base station with another frequency (perhaps one that enablesa higher modulation or data rate, or one that is complementary to thefirst frequency), the operator can provide coverage without the twocells interfering with each other in a frequency-division duplexed (FDD)deployment. Interference between these two cells actually can enable aUE to observe reduced signal quality from a macro cell, and therebyinitiate handover or reselection, which can occur when the macro celland small cell are deployed on the same frequency. However, in the casethat the macro cell and small cell are deployed on differentfrequencies, a UE may not experience deteriorating signal quality fromeither cell and may need to be prompted to perform a search to identifyhigher-quality cells and to initiate handover or reselection.

For simplicity, the following covers only the case of an inter-frequencyreselection, but the principle for intra-frequency reselection issimilar.

Let's take the case where the macro-cell serving the UE is on UARFCNmacro, and there is a femtocell in the UE's proximity, which operates onUARFCN femto, and which not only offers a higher data rate than theserving macro-cell, but also service at lower tariff or cost, in somecases. It is in the user's interest to benefit from this advantage, andit is also in the operator's interest to offload the traffic from themacro-cell, towards the femtocell. Macro offload is beneficial for anumber of reasons. For example, it enables the macro to be useful forthe wide variety of users that are not covered by femtocells, such asfor users that are moving at high speed in a moving vehicle. This methodtherefore enables the macro and the femtocell to best utilize theirrespective special functions and abilities.

The typical situation is that the “umbrella”-macro-cell, which covers alarge area, is still in such good enough “shape”quality-/signal-strength-wise, that the above-mentioned threshold is notreached, and hence the UE does not initiate a search for the femtocellon UARFCN femto. Reselection to the femtocell therefore mostly doesn'thappen.

The same problem/principle applies to the case where the UE is campingon a femtocell, but at a remote location (large distance/path loss fromthat femtocell), where it would be appropriate if the UE re-selected toanother, closer (neighbor) femtocell. In this case, the UE has a biggerpath-loss to the serving femtocell than to the neighboring femtocell,which requires a substantial amount of transmit power when a radio linkis established to the serving cell (also during the ongoing radio link).This generates high interference at the neighbor femtocell receiver.Facilitating the re-selection to the neighboring femto-cell would avoidthis problem and also lead overall to a better distribution of UEs amongfemtocells.

For simplicity, the case of re-selection from a macro-cell to afemtocell is described in the following chapters, but the proposed ideaapplies to re-selection from femtocells to femtocells as well.

Several ways to solve the problem described herein are proposed today,but all have their significant disadvantages. These are:

One idea is to change the threshold “Sintersearch” such that this UEsearch & measure process is triggered earlier, i.e. while the servingmacro-cell is still in (very) good shape. The significant drawback isthat this obliges the UE to frequent/continuous measurements during idleoperation, and so the UE will consume much more power than is normallythe case (i.e. with the current “normal” value of Sintersearch). Thewhole purpose of Sintersearch would be void—the UE's idle (“standby”)time would be significantly reduced.

Another idea is to equip the femtocell with a RF jammer, which wouldtransmit noise on UARFCN macro, and cause sufficient interference in itsproximity that the surrounding macro-cell's signal quality deteriorates.The threshold would be reached and the UE would start the search &measure process.

The drawback to certain prior art solutions is that the macro-cell'sfrequency is jammed (subject to interference), which causes asignificant degradation of the macro-cell quality (i.e. downlink datatransfer capacity) in the femto-cell's coverage range. In the worst casethe macro-cell is not usable in that area. The other drawback is thatthe area around the femtocell access point where the UE would bemotivated to search for the femtocell is difficult to control/determine,and one would have to arbitrate between maximizing this “re-selectionrange” (i.e. makie it identical with the femtocell's foreseen coverage),with large-scale negative effects on the macrocell, and keeping this“re-selection range” small, which isn't user-friendly, because the userwould have to approach the femtocell base station close enough for theUE to lock on it.

Another drawback to the prior art is the need for an additionaltransmitter (RF, filters and amplifer), which implies additionalhardware costs.

Proposed Solution

The basic principle discussed herein is to dynamically toggle a cellselection/reselection threshold, e.g., the Sintersearch threshold,between the normal value and a max-value that forces the UE to executethe search & measurement process. This “on-off” switching is similar toa pulse-width modulation, and is called “Sintersearch beacon,” inallusion to a light beacon in navigation.

The idea is to keep the duty cycle (the relative “on-time”) short enoughsuch that the battery consumption in UE idle mode is not significantlyincreased, because in this case, the UE takes into account the “normal”qualification threshold most of the time, and only during a short timedoes the UE perform ‘unconditional’ search & measuring of cells (i.e.also femtocells) on UARFCN femto. While the duration of the normalbehavior is in the order of minutes, the latter's duration is in theorder of seconds. In some embodiments, the cell reselection parametermay be transmitted to all UEs associated with the base station in thesystem information block (SIB) of the base station control channel.

This feature of “Sintersearch beacon” (toggling of System Informationparameter “Sintersearch”) would have to be implemented by the macro-NWvendor (or FAP SW supplier), in their Radio Network Controllers (RNCs),and based on an input from their Operation & Maintenance Center (OMC).Latter would communicate the duty cycle/“on-off”-ratio to the RNC, andthe RNC would schedule the toggling of Sintersearch appropriately.

Interestingly, Qualcomm has mentioned such principle in itspublications, but which is realized through another method. That methodwould require that all UEs of the world are upgraded to some newstandardized feature. Qualcomm has stated: “One solution which canguarantee femto discovery without causing excessive cell search is theUE enhancement, for which the UE performs periodic interfrequencysearches every few minutes (e.g., every two to five minutes)irrespective of serving cell quality. This method achieves very goodfemto discovery performance without a need to increase the macroSintersearch setting. Once the UE finds a femto on the other frequencyand its CPICH Ec/Io is higher than −12 dB (cf. Table 1), the UE willattempt to reselect to the femto. As shown in FIG. 10, the femtodiscovery performance of the HUE is greatly improved with the proposedslow background search (SBS). Here the period of the background searchis 300 sec. A major drawback of this method, however, is that it onlyapplies to future UEs and does not solve the femtocell discovery issuefor legacy UEs. To solve the femto discovery issue of legacy UEs, wepropose a cell reselection beacon as described in the next section.”This is not feasible, as they admit. In the context of this idea,Qualcomm suggests/indicates that a 5-minutes time separation betweeninter-frequency measurements would lead to great “FAP discoveryperformance” without the need to increase Sintersearch.

The here-proposed solution requires in contrast a change in the UTRANnetwork which is transparent to the mobiles, and effectively allows forexactly what Qualcomm would like to see in terms of UE behavior (“slowbackground search”), and with today's UEs.

The proposed solution has the following advantages: only a small amountof increase in average idle power consumption (1-2%); no jamming ofmacro-cells; no degradation of downlink macro-cell capacity; and no needfor additional hardware (i.e. jammer-transmitter).

Different values of the thresholds are contemplated. In someembodiments, if a threshold has a maximum value, the beaconing methoddescribed herein may instruct the UE to set the threshold to its maximumvalue, and then to return the threshold to another lower value suitablefor ordinary use. In some embodiments, a dormancy period, for example, 5minutes, may be followed by an activation period of an elevatedthreshold. The percentage of time used for the activation period can bethought of as a duty cycle. In some embodiments, the dormancy periodplus the activation period may constitute a periodicity of the system.In some embodiments, configuration may be effected by passing theperiodicity of the system, plus in some embodiments the desired max anddormant (ordinary time) threshold values, to the cell. In someembodiments, a maximum delay for reselection may be defined using ahysteresis parameter or another parameter.

The proposed solution has certain characteristics that constituteadditional work items: the RNC software needs to be extended by thisfeature (work on NW vendor side); the network operation & maintenancecenter (OMC) needs to incorporate this notion of a duty cycle for the“Sintersearch-PWM”; and because an operator's UMTS/UTRAN network canconsist of equipment from various vendors, this feature would best haveto be standardized.

Following figure describes the operation of the S-inter-/intra-searchbeacon. The solution's trade-off is delay before measurement andreselection, and battery consumption. Shorter delay costs more frequentmeasurement and therefore more battery.

Applicability to 3G—other types of reselection could also apply, asfollows: inter-RAT: SsearchRAT; Context of Hierarchical Cell Structure(HCS): Sintrasearch, Sintersearch, SsearchRAT. This is also applicablealso to 4G/LTE: SrxlevServing<sIntraSearch (SIB 3); andSrxlevServing<sNonIntraSearch (SIB 3).

3GPP TS 25.133, 4.2.2.1 Measurement and evaluation of cell selectioncriteria S of serving cell, states: the UE shall measure the CPICH Ec/Ioand CPICH RSCP level of the serving cell and evaluate the cell selectioncriterion S defined in [1] for the serving cell at least every DRXcycle.

3GPP TS 25.133, 4.2.2.3 Measurements of inter-frequency FDD cellsstates: If priority information for UTRA FDD carrier frequencies isprovided in the measurement control systems information and the S-valueof the UTRA serving cell is greater than Threshserving_high then the UEshall search for any higher or equal priority UTRA inter-frequency cellsat least every Thigher_priority_search where Thigher_priority_search isdescribed in section 4.2.2. If higher priority UTRA cells are found bythe higher priority search, they shall be measured at least every(Ncarrier−1)*TmeasureFDD, . . . . The parameter Ncarrier is the numberof carriers used for FDD cells.

The same principle can be applied for Sintrasearch, that is, forreselection to an inTRA-frequency Femtocell. The principle can beapplied to both measurement quantities for cell reselection (i.e.CPICH-EcNo and CPICH-RSCP).

The on-time in the duty cycle must consider any time required toqualify/trigger reselection (e.g. TevaluateFDD, Treselection timer . . .), as well as measurement periods (Ncarrier, TmeasureFDD, both afunction of DRX cycle length). In some embodiments, values are in therange of 0.6 to 10 seconds. In some embodiments, various offsets andhysteresis values may be contemplated in addition to or in conjunctionwith the base thresholds described herein, as known in the art in eachof the relevant standards. For example, hysteresis parameters may beused to reduce reselection based on spurious or transient readings, andoffset parameters may be used to reduce ping-ponging (immediatereselection or handover to a prior cell). As a specific example,according to the UMTS standard, Qrxlevminoffset is subtracted fromQrxlevmin to calculate a minimum RSRP requirement for cell selection.Qrxlevmin may be used as the cell (re-)selection parameter, and theordinary operation of Qrxlevminoffset would be preserved.

In some embodiments, the present method could be applied to other UEstates, such as cell PCH state as well as IDLE state, or 4G LTE IDLEstate. Cell PCH mode is used when the UE is available for paging. Thecell reselection parameter may be a SsearchRAT threshold. The cellreselection parameter may be an SrxlevServing parameter in a Long TermEvolution (LTE) radio access technology. Different cell reselectionparameters may be used for different RATs, such that the validreselection parameter that is used while the mobile device is idle isused for each RAT as appropriate.

Subsequent to receiving the instruction to increase the cell reselectionthreshold, if the UE identifies a better cell to connect to, the UEtypically will not perform any signaling, since the UE is still in theIDLE state. No feedback or signaling is sent from the UE to thebroadcasting cell. When the UE subsequently activates or connects, itwill attach to the newly-identified cell.

Additional Power Consumption of macro-cell UEs with Sintersearch-Beacon

At usual/normal level of Sintersearch (e.g. 5), assume the following:10% of the macro-cell's UEs do constantly inter-frequency measurements,with each of those UEs consuming <P,idle,with-inter-search>; 90% of theUEs don't do inter-frequency measurements and consume<P,idle,no-inter-search>; and a 2% duty cycle on Sintersearch Beacon.

It follows that the overall average power consumption of each UE isP,overall,no-Sintersearch-Beacon=10%*<P,idle,with-inter-search>+90%*<P,idle,no-inter-search>.

With the proposed Sintersearch-Beacon, 100% of the UEs dointer-frequency search (at least intermittently) and consume<P,overall,with-Sintersearch-Beacon>.

When using the Sintersearch-Beacon, we have an overall average powerconsumption of each UE, of P,overall,with-Sintersearch-Beacon=10%*<Pidlewith-inter-search>+90%*(2%*<P,idle,with-inter-search>+98%*<P,idle,no-inter-search>).

So, the overall increase of power consumption with introduction ofSintersearch-Beacon is: P,delta=P,overall,with-Sintersearch-Beacon−P,overall,no-S-intersearch-Beacon=90%*2%*(<P,idle,with-inter-search>−<P,idle,no-inter-search>).

That is less than 2% of the difference between power consumption whendoing ‘constantly’ (still means only once per paging cycle!)inter-frequency search and the power consumption when inter-frequencysearch is not taking place.

In relative terms, the additional power that results from deploying theSintersearch-Beacon is:P,delta/P,overall,no-S-intersearch-Beacon=90%*2%*(<P,idle,with-inter-search>−<P,idle,no-inter-search>)/(10%*<P,idle,with-inter-search>+90%*<P,idle,no-inter-search>)<90%*2%(<P,idle,with-inter-search>−<P,idle,no-inter-search>)/(100%*<P,idle,no-inter-search>)=90%*2%*(<P,idle,with-inter-search>/<P,idle,no-inter-search>−1)

In other words, the relative increase of UE power due toSintersearch-Beacon is smaller than:90%*2%*(<P,idle,with-inter-search>/<P,idle,no-inter-search>−1)

For example: <P,idle,with-inter-search>/<P,idle,no-inter-search>=5 W/1W, such that the relative increase in power used by the UE/modem<7.2%.

Note: this is only the increase of the modem power, not the increase oftotal power consumed by a smartphone.

General formula for relative power increase with use of the SintersearchBeacon:

The average relative increase in power consumption of UEs with use ofSintersearch-Beacon, compared to the operationwithout SintersearchBeacon is:Delta-Power,relative<Alpha*Duty-Cycle-of-Sintersearch-Beacon*(P,idle,with-interfreq-search/P,idle,no-interfreq-search−1),where ‘Alpha’: the statistical/average share of those macro-cell's UEsthat don't do inter-frequency search at any moment (with no SintersearchBeacon deployed), and‘Duty-Cycle-of-Sintersearch-Beacon’=Period_A/(Period_A+Period_B).

FIG. 1 is an architecture diagram of a wireless network, in accordancewith some embodiments. Macro base station 101 is shown, along with smallcell base station 102. The two cells are provisioned in anoverlay/underlay configuration, such that macro cell 101 has coveragearea 101 a, which entirely overlaps with the coverage area 102 a ofsmall cell 102. The coverage areas are shown with lines of equal signalstrength to indicate the relative strength of coverage at differentpoints. As shown, macro base station 101 is connected to radio networkcontroller (RNC) 103, which in turn is connected to serving gatewaysupport node (SGSN) 104 and mobile switching center (MSC) 105, whichtogether are part of a mobile core network 106. In some embodiments,small cell 102 is also connected to RNC 103. The cells are all 3G cellsfor purposes of explaining the present disclosure, but variousmulti-radio access technology (RAT) and virtualization schemes arecontemplated with respect to both macro cell 101 and small cell 102,which may involve other RAT core networks (not shown). The presentdisclosure relates to sending out a cell reselection threshold from cell101, or from cell 102, or from another cell in the network. UserEquipments (UEs) 107 and 108 are shown. UE 107 is in a location that iswell-covered by signal from macro cell 101. UE 108 is in a location thatis poorly covered by macro cell 101 but well-covered by small cell 102.

In the case that small cell 102 is using the same frequency as macrocell 101 (intra-frequency reselection case), the small cell iseffectively jamming the macro cell's signal within its coverage area 102a. This results in the small cell having better signal quality withinits coverage area. However, in the interfrequency coverage area, wheretwo different frequencies are being used, the macro cell 101 does notexperience diminished signal quality and hence the UE 108 has no reasonto reselect or hand over.

FIG. 2 is a simplified timeline diagram of interfrequency search, inaccordance with the prior art. Signal strength is plotted against time.Macro cell 101 is shown with signal strength line 201, which may be ameasurement of EcNo, RSCP, or any other signal strength measurement, andwhich may be shown in decibels. The line changes over time as a UE movesfrom a first location to a second location, for example, from thelocation of UE 107 to the location of UE 108. An Sintersearch threshold202 is also shown, which is constant. At time 203, the UE is configuredto begin searching and monitoring for interfrequency neighbors when theUE's serving cell's signal strength drops below this threshold; this isa precondition for reselection. Searching for neighbors reveals to theUE that a new cell is in the area, shown as line 204. At time 205, theUE observes that the new cell's signal is greater than the originalcell, and the UE performs reselection to the new cell. The inventorshave considered equivalents that include intra-frequency search, whichinvolves a similar mechanism, as well as the use of offsets orhysteresis parameters.

FIG. 3 is a timeline diagram of interfrequency search with aninterfrequency search beacon, in accordance with some embodiments. Avalue of the Sintersearch threshold on the y-axis is plotted againsttime on the x-axis. Prior to time 301, a normal non-zero Sintersearchthreshold is set at the nodeB. At time 301, the nodeB makes a change tothe system information block (SIB), and the MIB indicates that a changehas been made in SIB 3 content (through a modified cell value tag, forexample). In the SIB, e.g., SIB3, the nodeB indicates that the thresholdis increased to max or contains a new, high Sintersearch thresholdvalue, e.g., 20. The UE is thereby forced to do interfrequency search.

In between time 301 and time 302, during period 303, the UE performsinterfrequency search during this period and is in a higher powerconsumption state. Sometime during this period (set to about the maxpaging cycle of the serving macro cell), the UE may: look for paging,and also read the MIB; find that the MIB indicates a change on SIB 3;read SIB3; determine that it has to do inter-/intra-frequency search;and, at the next opportunity, may perform an inter-/intra-frequencysearch on specified UARFCN(s). This assumes it finds no interfrequencyFAP.

At time 302, the nodeB makes a further change to the SIB to bring thethreshold back to normal. The MIB indicates a change in SIB 3 contentthrough a modified cell value tag, and SIB3 contains a Sintersearchthreshold with a normal value. The UE is directed to performinterfrequency search during normal conditions. After time 302, duringperiod 304, the UE stops interfrequency search and is in a normal powerconsumption period. E.g., during this period, the UE may, sometimeduring this period (corresponding to the max paging cycle of the cell):look for paging, and also read the MIB; find that the MIB indicates achange on SIB3; read SIB3; determine that it no longer needs to do aninterfrequency search; and stop interfrequency search.

This can be repeated as a cycle, with the Sintersearch thresholdincreased at time 305 and returned to normal at time 306. In someembodiments, beaconing is contemplated for Sintrasearch according to thesame method.

FIG. 4 is a second timeline diagram of interfrequency search with aninterfrequency search beacon, in accordance with some embodiments. Macrocell 101's signal strength is shown as signal strength measurement 401(such as EcNo or RSCP). Small cell 102's signal strength is shown assignal strength measurement 405. Without beaconing, the UE will see thatmacro signal 401 is greater than Sintersearch threshold 402 at alltimes, and will never reselect to small cell 102. However, beginning attime 404 and continuing through time 403, beaconing is performed at thecell, causing the Sintersearch threshold to be elevated. At time 404,the UE receives the new Sintersearch threshold and begins searching andmonitoring interfrequency cells, and this search may continue duringperiod 403. This causes reselection of the UE to small cell 102, whichhas significantly improved signal. Reselection may in fact occur afterthe period 403 has expired, due to delays, offsets, hysteresis, orpolicy processing at the UE; however, after beaconing has beeninstituted for the first time, the UE is made aware of cell 102. Themaximum delay for reselection is expected to be until the beginning ofthe next beaconing period, in some embodiments. Time periods 403 and 407may be on the order of 5 seconds.

Another way to understand this process is that there are two timeperiods, a high-activity, high-power time period (periods 403 and 407)and a low-activity, low-power time period (406). The beacon period ishigh-activity because searching, measuring, and monitoring arehigh-power activities for the UE's radio. By contrast, the quiet period406 requires very little power. By adjusting the balance between thesetwo time periods, it is possible to effect some control over UE powerusage.

In some embodiments, the presence or absence of more or less small cellsin an underlay format can be used to determine the relative length ofthese periods. In some embodiments, a telecom operator may optimize theperiods for a certain level of UE battery impact. In some embodiments,different duty cycles may be selected based on different levels ofdensity of cell coverage.

FIGS. 5A, 5B and 5C are schematic architecture diagrams showingsignaling, in accordance with some embodiments. FIG. 5A showscommunication between a coordinating server 501, here a ParallelWireless HetNet Gateway™, in communication with a nodeB 502, here aParallel Wireless Converged Wireless System™ multi-radio accesstechnology (multi-RAT) base station. CWS 502 includes both a radionetwork controller and a nodeB functionality. According to FIG. 5A, HNG501 makes determinations about when to increase the Sintersearchthreshold and when to return it to its normal level, and accordingly,the CWS 502 receives and forwards any value for the thresholdimmediately upon receipt. Beaconing functionality is enabled or disabledat the HNG.

FIG. 5B shows communication in an embodiment built upon astandard-compliant infrastructure. Operations and management controller(OAMC) 503 is in communication with a radio network controller (RNC)504, which in turn manages a plurality of nodeBs 505 a, 505 b, 505 c.OAMC 503 sends configuration information, specifically, Sintersearchnormal and max thresholds, and in some embodiments a duty cycle, to theRNC. The RNC 504 manages the beaconing functionality and sends it to thenodeBs 505 a, 505 b, 505 c, which then set the thresholds according tothe duty cycle, and send the cell reselection threshold to UEs incommunication with the nodeBs.

FIG. 5C shows communication in a further embodiment. Coordinating server506 is in communication with CWS 507, which is a combined RNC and nodeB.The HNG may send configuration information to the CWS, which may manage,activate, and deactivate the beaconing functionality using theconfiguration information, e.g., Sintersearch normal and max thresholds,and a duty cycle. The duty cycle may be a percentage of seconds, in someembodiments.

In some embodiments, different sets of configuration parameters may becontemplated. For example, in place of a duty cycle, a duration of anactive period and a dormant period, or a single representative period,may be provided. As another example, the Sintersearch max threshold maybe omitted, as the maximum value can be obtained by the nodeB withoutconfiguration. As another example, the Sintersearch normal threshold maybe managed separately from the beaconing functionality. As anotherexample, which applies when both of these apply, a single Boolean may betransferred to turn beaconing on and off, with all other parametersbeing preconfigured. As another example, solely a duty cycle may beused.

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a coordinating server, in accordancewith some embodiments. Coordinating server 601 provides services to, andis coupled to, nodeB 1 602 and nodeB 6 603, on a RAN side of a network(i.e., inside of the gateway), such as two-way proxying and NAT thathides the RAN from the core network. Server 601 provides services to,and is coupled to, 3G/4G core network 604, macro nodeB 605, and macronodeB 606, on a core network side of the network (outside of thegateway). As described, the coordinating server may provide services to3G RAN/core nodes, or 4G RAN/core nodes, or both. The coordinatingserver may perform interworking between 3G and 4G.

Within server 601 are self-organizing network (SON) module 611,containing neighbor relation table (NRT) 612 and UE measurement reportprocessing module 613; evolved packet core (EPC) module 621, containingcore network finite state machine module 622 and macro eNodeB table 623;radio access network (RAN) module 631, containing finite state machinemodule 632 and nodeB table 634; and user equipment (UE) module 641,containing UE finite state machine module 642 and S1/X2 handover mappingtable 643. In some embodiments, SON module 611 may perform NRTmaintenance, load information processing and fractional frequency reuse(FFR) processing; RAN module 631 may perform X2 association managementwith eNodeBs 602, 603; EPC module 621 may perform X2 associationmanagement with macro eNodeBs 605, 606; and UE module may perform X2handover and S1/X2 translation between nodeBs 602, 603 and macro nodeBs605, 606. Finite state machine modules 622, 632, 642 may include one ormore states for modeling the operational state of a connected EPC, UE,or RAN, respectively. More than one FSM may be present at each ofmodules 621, 631, 641, so that server 601 may be enabled to model theoperational state of several network nodes at once. All the abovemanagers/modules interact with each other to accomplish the assignedfunctionality. In some embodiments, RAN module 631 may control beaconingfunctionality, and may do so in coordination with NRT 612, such thatbeaconing may be enabled more often or for a greater duty cycle when agiven nodeB is identified as having many neighbors, and in coordinationwith UE module 641, such that beaconing may be enabled more often or fora greater duty cycle when a given UE is known to be in a location withsmall cell underlay/macro cell overlay, for example.

In some embodiments, server 601 may include one or more processors, eachwith one or more processor cores. Each of modules 611, 621, 631, and 641are coupled to each other within server 601, and may execute on one ormore shared processors (not shown) coupled with memory (not shown).Server 601 may include a real-time operating system, such as a Linuxoperating system, and may include an operating system that distributestasks among multiple cores. Server 601 may provide one or more ofmodules 611, 621, 631, 641 as processes, threads, user-mode orkernel-mode processes, processes in hardware or in software, in someembodiments. In some embodiments, each of modules 611, 621, 631, 641 mayexecute on the same server 601; in other embodiments, these modules mayexecute on remote machines connected via a network. In some embodiments,a remote failover server (not shown) may be made available for handlingfailures at server 601. The failover mechanism may involve checkpointingoperations at server 601 in each of the modules therein. Certainoperations may be hardware accelerated, such as network processingtasks, IPsec tasks, deep packet inspection tasks, or other tasks.

Server 601 may include one or more network interfaces; these networkinterfaces may include Ethernet (10/100/1000/10000 Mbit) interfaces,Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n/ac/af/ad) interfaces, 3G or 4G interfaces, virtualinterfaces, or other interfaces. In some embodiments, one networkinterface may be directed towards the core network and located at, orcoupled to, EPC module 621; this interface would communicate using theS1 protocol to MME 604 and using the X2 protocol to macro cells 605,606. In some embodiments, another network interface may be directedtowards one or more RANs internal to the gateway and connected to RANmodule 631, for communicating to RANs 602, using either S1 or X2 asappropriate. Translation or interworking of protocols may occur at oneor more of modules 611, 621, 631, or 641 as appropriate. In someembodiments, SON module 611 may also be coupled to an interface forcommunicating with RANs 602, 603; this interface may be labeled the SONinterface, and the NETCONF protocol (XML over HTTPS) may be used tocommunicate in a proprietary or non-proprietary manner with RANs 602,603 regarding network configuration, orchestration, and coordinationoperations.

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an enhanced base station, in accordancewith some embodiments. Base station 700 may include processor 702,processor memory 704 in communication with the processor, basebandprocessor 706, and baseband processor memory 708 in communication withthe baseband processor. Base station 700 may also include first radiotransceiver 710 and second radio transceiver 712, internal universalserial bus (USB) port 716, and subscriber information module card (SIMcard) 718 coupled to USB port 714. In some embodiments, the second radiotransceiver 712 itself may be coupled to USB port 716, andcommunications from the baseband processor may be passed through USBport 716. The enhanced base station may be a mesh network base station,in communication with other mesh nodes via Wi-Fi.

A virtualization layer 730 may also be included for mediatingcommunications with an evolved packet core EPC, specifically includingthe core network EPC (not shown) and local evolved packet core (EPC)module 720. Local EPC 720 may be used for authenticating users andperforming other EPC-dependent functions when no backhaul link isavailable. Local EPC 720 may include local HSS 722, local MME 724, localSGW 726, and local PGW 728, as well as other modules. Local EPC 720 mayincorporate these modules as software modules, processes, or containers.Local EPC 720 may alternatively incorporate these modules as a smallnumber of monolithic software processes. Virtualization layer 730 andlocal EPC 720 may each run on processor 702 or on another processor, ormay be located within another device.

Processor 702 and baseband processor 706 are in communication with oneanother. Processor 702 may perform routing functions, and may determineif/when a switch in network configuration is needed. Baseband processor706 may generate and receive radio signals for both radio transceivers710 and 712, based on instructions from processor 702. In someembodiments, processors 702 and 706 may be on the same physical logicboard. In other embodiments, they may be on separate logic boards.

The first radio transceiver 710 may be a radio transceiver capable ofproviding LTE eNodeB functionality, or 5G gNodeB functionality, and maybe capable of higher power and multi-channel OFDMA. The second radiotransceiver 712 may be a radio transceiver capable of providing LTE UEfunctionality. Both transceivers 710 and 712 are capable of receivingand transmitting on one or more LTE bands. In some embodiments, eitheror both of transceivers 710 and 712 may be capable of providing both LTEeNodeB and LTE UE functionality. Transceiver 710 may be coupled toprocessor 702 via a Peripheral Component Interconnect-Express (PCI-E)bus, and/or via a daughtercard. As transceiver 712 is for providing LTEUE functionality, in effect emulating a user equipment, it may beconnected via the same or different PCI-E bus, or by a USB bus, and mayalso be coupled to SIM card 718.

SIM card 718 may provide information required for authenticating thesimulated UE to the evolved packet core (EPC). When no access to anoperator EPC is available, local EPC 720 may be used, or another localEPC on the network may be used. This information may be stored withinthe SIM card, and may include one or more of an international mobileequipment identity (IMEI), international mobile subscriber identity(IMSI), or other parameter needed to identify a UE. Special parametersmay also be stored in the SIM card or provided by the processor duringprocessing to identify to a target eNodeB that device 700 is not anordinary UE but instead is a special UE for providing backhaul to device700.

Wired backhaul or wireless backhaul may be used. Wired backhaul may bean Ethernet-based backhaul (including Gigabit Ethernet), or afiber-optic backhaul connection, or a cable-based backhaul connection,in some embodiments. Additionally, wireless backhaul may be provided inaddition to wireless transceivers 710 and 712, which may be Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ad/ah, Bluetooth, ZigBee, microwave (includingline-of-sight microwave), or another wireless backhaul connection. Anyof the wired and wireless connections may be used for either access orbackhaul, according to identified network conditions and needs, and maybe under the control of processor 702 for reconfiguration.

Other elements and/or modules may also be included, such as a nodeB,home eNodeB, a local gateway (LGW), a self-organizing network (SON)module, or another module. Additional radio amplifiers, radiotransceivers and/or wired network connections may also be included.

Processor 702 may identify the appropriate network configuration, andmay perform routing of packets from one network interface to anotheraccordingly. Processor 702 may use memory 704, in particular to store arouting table to be used for routing packets. Baseband processor 706 mayperform operations to generate the radio frequency signals fortransmission or retransmission by both transceivers 710 and 712.Baseband processor 706 may also perform operations to decode signalsreceived by transceivers 710 and 712. Baseband processor 706 may usememory 708 to perform these tasks.

Additional embodiments of the present application are contemplated.

In the present disclosure, the words “cell,” “eNB,” “eNodeB,” and“gNodeB” are used to refer to a cellular base station. However, one ofskill in the art would appreciate that it would be possible to providethe same functionality and services to other types of base stations,specifically to home eNodeBs (HeNodeBs), as well as any equivalents.

While the present disclosure uses the terms “small cell” and “macrocell,” this term is used merely to illustrate the concepts herein, andnothing is implied regarding size, power level etc. for any cells thatcould be used with the disclosed systems and methods, i.e. “small cell”may be interpreted as including macro cells, femto cells, multi-radioaccess technology (RAT) access nodes, indoor cells, outdoor cells, etc.The word “X2” herein may be understood to include X2 or also Xn, asappropriate.

Various alternative embodiments are also contemplated by the inventors.For example, certain functions may be performed at an eNodeB, or at amulti-radio access technology node (multi-RAT) node, instead of at avirtualization server. The virtualization server may be known as an LTEaccess controller. The functions of the virtualization server may bebroken up and spread across multiple network nodes, or multiple softwareor hardware modules within the same network node, and may be physicallylocated in a single location, or multiple locations. The network nodemay be in the data path located between the radio access network (RAN)and the core network, in some embodiments, or may be located at anotherlocation in the network. A high-bandwidth wired connection may be usedfor backhaul, such as coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, or Ethernet, ora reduced-bandwidth wireless connection, such as microwave,line-of-sight, or other physical connections may be used as backhaul.

The protocols described herein may be optimized for greater or lesserlatency, for more or fewer mesh nodes, for more or fewer data streams,and other alternatives. In some embodiments, these optimizations may beperformed at the eNodeB, at the virtualization server, within a functionperforming radio resource allocation and coding selection, or at anotherlocation. In some embodiments, a virtualization server may identify andinitiate power adjustments to improve channel quality.

In some embodiments, the mesh network nodes may provide complete orpartial guesses at what paths are the optimal or best paths during aparticular time interval, and may be enabled to send messages back tothe virtualization server to communicate these complete or partialguesses.

In some embodiments, the base stations described herein may becompatible with a Long Term Evolution (LTE) radio transmission protocol,or another air interface. The LTE-compatible base stations may beeNodeBs, or may be gNodeBs, or may be hybrid base stations supportingmultiple technologies and may have integration across multiple cellularnetwork generations such as steering, memory sharing, data structuresharing, shared connections to core network nodes, etc. In addition tosupporting the LTE protocol, the base stations may also support otherair interfaces, such as UMTS/HSPA, CDMA/CDMA2000, GSM/EDGE, GPRS, EVDO,other 3G/2G, legacy TDD, 5G, or other air interfaces used for mobiletelephony. In some embodiments, the base stations described herein maysupport Wi-Fi air interfaces, which may include one of802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ad/af/ah. In some embodiments, the base stationsdescribed herein may support 802.16 (WiMAX), or other air interfaces. Insome embodiments, the base stations described herein may provide accessto land mobile radio (LMR)-associated radio frequency bands. In someembodiments, the base stations described herein may also support morethan one of the above radio frequency protocols, and may also supporttransmit power adjustments for some or all of the radio frequencyprotocols supported.

The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplaryembodiments of the present invention. In some embodiments, softwarethat, when executed, causes a device to perform the methods describedherein may be stored on a computer-readable medium such as a computermemory storage device, a hard disk, a flash drive, an optical disc, orthe like. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the presentinvention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing fromthe spirit or essential characteristics thereof. For example, wirelessnetwork topology can also apply to wired networks, optical networks, andthe like. The methods may apply to LTE-compatible networks, toUMTS-compatible networks, or to networks for additional protocols thatutilize radio frequency data transmission. Various components in thedevices described herein may be added, removed, or substituted withthose having the same or similar functionality. Various steps asdescribed in the figures and specification may be added or removed fromthe processes described herein, and the steps described may be performedin an alternative order, consistent with the spirit of the invention.Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to beillustrative of, but not limiting of, the scope of the invention, whichis specified in the following claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A wireless network system, comprising: afirst cellular base station having a first coverage area; secondcellular base station having a second coverage area; a user equipment(UE) in communication with the first base station; wherein aninstruction is sent from a first cellular base station to the UE in anidle mode to adjust an existing cell reselection parameter at a UE to ahigh value, wherein the radio network is one or more of a Global Systemfor Mobile Communications (GSM), Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution(EDGE), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), CDMA2000,Long Term Evolution (LTE), Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTE-Advanced),or 5G gNodeB radio network; wherein an instruction is sent to the UE toreturn the cell reselection parameter to its previous value, after afirst predetermined interval; and wherein a second instruction is sentto the UE in an idle mode to adjust the cell reselection parameter atthe UE to the high value, after a second predetermined periodicinterval, causing the UE to reselect to a cell with superior signal evenwhen the UE is under good coverage attached to the first cellular basestation, and repeatedly raising the cell reselection parameter to a highvalue, in order to cause the UE to perform a neighboring cell searchfrom idle mode and identity the second cellular base station to which toattach, thereby offloading the first cellular base station.
 2. Thewireless network system of claim 1, wherein the cell reselectionparameter is an Sintersearch threshold.
 3. The wireless network systemof claim 1, wherein the cell reselection parameter is an Sintrasearchthreshold.
 4. The wireless network system of claim 1, wherein the highvalue is a maximum permitted value.
 5. The wireless network system ofclaim 1, wherein the first predetermined interval and the secondpredetermined periodic interval are configured to cause the UE toperform a periodic neighboring cell search while having a 5% impact onprojected UE battery life.
 6. The wireless network system of claim 1,wherein the first predetermined interval is 5 seconds and the secondpredetermined periodic interval is every 5 minutes.
 7. The wirelessnetwork system of claim 1, wherein the previous value is a cellreselection parameter value configured based on an assumption thatsignificantly overlapping cell coverage is rare.
 8. The wireless networksystem of claim 1, wherein the cell with superior signal is a small cellconfigured to cover a small area that is a subset of the coverage areaof the existing macro cell.
 9. The met wireless network system hod ofclaim 1, wherein the radio network is a nodeB or eNodeB, and wherein theradio network is configured with the first predetermined interval andthe second predetermined periodic interval by a coordinator node in anoperator core network.
 10. The wireless network system of claim 1,wherein the cell reselection parameter is a SsearchRAT threshold. 11.The wireless network system of claim 1, wherein the cell reselectionparameter is an SrxlevServing parameter in a Long Term Evolution (LTE)radio access technology.
 12. The wireless network system of claim 1wherein a message is received from a core network using a first radioaccess technology and sent to a base station using a second radio accesstechnology.